Median Deal Size
Definition
Median dollar value across active pipeline opportunities — the typical deal in the pipeline, robust against the few-big-deals skew that distorts the average. The honest read on the "core motion" deal-size; if the team is winning a few oversized deals but the median is shrinking, the underlying motion is degrading even though the topline numbers look fine. Common pitfall: omitting median in dashboards in favor of just the average lets concentration risk hide. A best-practice board pack always shows both.
Why it matters
The most honest read on the typical motion — distinguishes "we have a real scalable motion" (high median) from "we have a few oversized deals carrying everything else" (low median, high average).
How it's calculated
Median Deal Size = 50th-percentile deal_value across active pipeline opportunities. Same value convention (TCV vs ACV) as upstream metrics; same active-pipeline stage filter as average_deal_size. How to interpret it
When median deal size is stable while average deal size rises, the pipeline is becoming more skewed (a few mega-deals) — concentration risk. When median rises with average, the entire motion is shifting up-market. When median shrinks while average stays flat, deal-size compression is happening in the core motion (usually competitive pricing pressure).
Source
imboard Editorial
Stage relevance
Typically owned by
Related KPIs
Mean dollar value across active pipeline opportunities (Pipeline Value / Pipeline Deal Count). Distinct from sales.avg_contract_value (ACV) which measures closed-won deals — average_deal_size is forward-looking pipeline-shape, ACV is realized output. Common pitfall: a few oversized deals materially skew the average — always inspect median_deal_size alongside; a large gap between average and median signals a few mega-deals that drive most of the projected number, which concentrates pipeline risk.
Sum of the dollar value of all active deals currently in the sales pipeline — unweighted (raw deal-value sum, not probability-weighted). Boards read this as the top-of-funnel sufficiency check: if pipeline coverage (pipeline value / forecast) drops below the historic conversion-rate-implied threshold, the forecast is at risk. Common pitfall: confusing pipeline value with weighted forecast — the unweighted number always exceeds the weighted, often by 3–5× depending on the stage mix. Always report both and the implied conversion ratio.
Total number of active opportunities in the pipeline (open stages only — excludes closed-won and closed-lost). The volume side of pipeline coverage; paired with pipeline_value gives the average deal size and the deal-count vs deal-size ratio that characterizes the motion shape. Common pitfall: counting non-bona-fide opportunities (orphaned trials, demo requests that never converted to a real evaluation) inflates the number — apply a stage-floor cutoff (e.g. SQL or higher) so the count reflects committed evaluation activity.
Average annualized contract value across new-customer deals signed during the period (ACV). Defines where the company plays on the SaaS deal-size spectrum and dictates the operating model — high-ACV businesses tolerate longer sales cycles and direct sales motions; low-ACV businesses must run product-led or inside-sales motions to keep CAC payback short. Common pitfall: blending new and expansion ACV obscures the new-logo deal-size trend that boards actually want to see. Anchored to KBCM/Sapphire SaaS Survey 2024 §Average Contract Value for cross-company benchmarking.
Track these KPIs with your board
I'mBoard helps startup CEOs report the metrics that matter, track resolutions, and run better board meetings.