Fundraising Strategy
Definition
Free-text narrative covering the planned fundraising approach for the current round: target investor types (lead profile, co-investors), timing, sequencing of the conversation, use of proceeds, milestones the round will get the company to, and the alternative scenarios if the primary plan slips. This is the "what is the CEO actually doing" section of the fundraising update. Common pitfall: strategy that does not name a target lead investor profile or use-of-proceeds milestone is not strategy — it is intent. Boards should push for specificity here.
Why it matters
Forces the CEO to articulate "what game we are playing" — boards offer better help when they understand the strategy, not just the numbers.
How it's calculated
Narrative — no calculation. Should cover (1) target investor profile, (2) sequencing / timing plan, (3) use of proceeds, (4) milestones funded, (5) downside scenarios. How to interpret it
A strategy that has not changed across consecutive board updates while the round has stalled is a red flag — typically requires a reframing conversation. A strategy that pivots every update is also a red flag — typically requires the board to push for commitment.
Source
imboard Editorial
Stage relevance
Typically owned by
Related KPIs
Current phase of the active fundraising round on a coarse state machine (e.g. not-started, in-progress, term-sheet, closing, closed). The board reads this to know which playbook applies — pipeline-building, diligence, closing, or post-close communications. Common pitfall: the field drifts when a round stalls or pivots, so treat each phase change as a board-update trigger. The PhasePlaybook widget binds to this enum and surfaces the appropriate phase guidance read-only beside the editor.
Target gross capital the company intends to raise in the currently active round (the "ask"). This is the headline number the CEO walks investors through and the board uses to sanity-check dilution and runway implications. Note the distinction from `total_round_size` (which can include third-party participation beyond the company-led ask) and from `minimum_close_amount` (the floor at which the round can close). Common pitfall: the target is updated mid-process when investor demand or strategy shifts — every change deserves a board note.
Count of distinct investors actively engaged in the current round — defined as taken a first meeting and not yet declined or fully committed. Effectively a fundraising-funnel "qualified leads" number. Common pitfall: rosy pipelines that include investors who ghosted weeks ago — best practice (echoed across NfX, First Round Review, and Bessemer founder essays) is to age-out any investor with no contact in 14+ days. Track separately from total intros taken and from hard commitments to make the conversion math legible.
Named risks that could prevent the round from closing as targeted — market conditions (general venture sentiment, sector-specific freeze), investor-side risk (anchor investor wobble, partner-meeting drop-off), company-side risk (a metric trending wrong direction, customer concentration concern surfaced in diligence), and timing risk (runway versus close date). Common pitfall: optimistic CEOs under-report risk factors. Boards should expect at least 2–3 named risks even in a healthy round — "no risks" is itself a risk signal.
Explicit assumptions underlying the fundraising plan: valuation expectation, lead-investor probability, time-to-close, post-close runway, and what changes if any assumption breaks. Common pitfall: assumptions are made implicitly and only surface in the postmortem. Boards should require this section to be reviewed each update — a board update where assumptions never change suggests they are not being tested, not that they are correct.
Track these KPIs with your board
I'mBoard helps startup CEOs report the metrics that matter, track resolutions, and run better board meetings.